Table of contents
Rationale
Following the MERIS Science Advisory Group recommendation,
ESA started the generation of some MERIS level 3
demonstration products, using the
MKL3 tool developed by ACRI-ST. The MKL3 tool is
implemented on the GRID On Demand Processing chain
at ESA and the MERIS
level 3 products are generated routinely and
distributed
to the user on the web.
Although the validation of level 3 data cannot replace
the validation of level 2 data, it may contribute to the
estimation of the measurements quality by providing
information:
- where in-situ data does not exist (and will
maybe never exist)
- at a global scale almost every day
- at daily, monthly, seasonal and annual temporal scales
almost everywhere
- on the long-term instrument stability
- on instrument ageing
The statistical analysis of the spatial variations of
the level 3 data combined with oceanographic knowledge can
lead us to a certain level of validation or invalidation
of the products. Of course, the huge number of available
points in the level 3 products increase the quality of the
statistics.
Comparisons of level 3 products between sensors can be
also of great interest to estimate the coherency between the
couples instrument + processing as well as to characterise
some possible inter-calibration between the products, for
example before any merging attempt.
Input data
The analysis has been applied to the MERIS monthly level 3
products available on the ESA web site (1/12° sinusoidal
grid) and the
MODIS and SeaWiFS level 3 products available on the NASA
Ocean Colour
web site (both at 9 km on an Plate-Carré
grid). The MERIS products have been reprojected on the
same 9km Plate-Carré grid before any computation
(using the Sutherland-Hodgeman area clipping and
flux-conserving algorithms).
Parameters
The following parameters are covered by the quality
control tasks:
- chlorophyll-a, case 1 water
- normalised water leaving radiances (nLw) at 412,
443, 490, 510 and 560 nm
- aerosol optical thickness over water at 865 nm
- Angstrom coefficient over water at 865 nm
Note that there is not a full coherency between the MERIS,
MODIS and SeaWiFS parameters:
- CHL1 is not obtained from the water leaving radiances
using the same sets of equations for the three
sensors. MERIS processing stage level is "Q". MODIS
processing level is 1.1. SeaWifs processing level
is 5.2.
- the spectral bands are not identical: MERIS sensor
measures at 412, 443, 490, 510 and 560 nm while MODIS
sensor measures at 412, 443, 488 and 551 nm
(no 510 nm band) and SeaWiFS observes at 412, 443,
490, 510 and 555 nm,
- the aerosol optical thickness is computed at 865 nm
for MERIS and SeaWiFS and 869 nm for MODIS
- the angstrom coefficient is provided at 865 nm for
MERIS, 531 nm for MODIS and 510 nm for SeaWiFS.
An inter-calibration correction is applied to
the MODIS and SeaWiFS CHL1 daily L3 products in order to get
compatible concentrations with respect to the MERIS sensor.
Validity limits for this conversion: 0.01 <
CHL1
MODIS/SeaWiFS < 13
A reverse formulation could be applied to the merged CHL1
products in order to get SeaWiFS-like CHL1 concentrations:
Validity limits for this conversion: 0.017 < CHL1
MERIS< 50
Zones
The statistical analysis has been performed at global level
and on a set of dedicated zones. These zones are usually
visible at all time of the year, except AtlS55 below
50°S and not fully visible during North Hemisphere
summer and AtlN55 above 50°N and not fully visible
during North Hemisphere winter.
- Global scale: Glob (all latitudes, any water depth),
Glob50 (latitudes between 50°S and 50°N, any
water depth), GlobDW (all latitudes, only deep water
- z>1000m), Glob50DW (latitudes between 50°S
and 50°N, only deep water), GlobEW (all latitudes,
eutrophic water case), GlobMW (all latitudes,
mesotrophic water case), GlobOW (all latitudes,
oligotrophic water case), GlobSW (all latitudes,
shallow water case),
- Zonal areas: slices of 10° from 50°S
to 50°N between 170°W and 150°W.
- Regional diagnostic sites are defined from
existing lists (cf. ClimZoo
final report
and Brian Franz
methodology, 2005), including the Hawaii region,
where the vicarious calibration of MODIS and SeaWiFS
sensors is performed.
| Short name
| Geolocation
| Long name
| Mask
|
| Glob
| -180 90 180 -90
| Global
| none
|
| Glob50
| -180 50 180 -50
| Latitude -50:+50
| none
|
| Glob50DW
| -180 50 180 -50
| Latitude -50:+50 - Deep water
| deep_water
|
| GlobDW
| -180 90 180 -90
| Global - Deep water
| deep_water
|
| GlobEW
| -180 90 180 -90
| Global - Eutrophic water
| eutrophic
|
| GlobMW
| -180 90 180 -90
| Global - Mesotrophic water
| mesotrophic
|
| GlobOW
| -180 90 180 -90
| Global - Oligotrophic water
| oligotrophic
|
| GlobSW
| -180 90 180 -90
| Global - Shallow water
| shallow_water
|
| Hawaii
| -158.5 19.9 -156.5 18.0
| Hawaii
| deep_water
|
| PacN
| -180.0 23.0 -159.4 15.0
| North Pacific
| deep_water
|
| PacNW
| 139.5 22.7 165.6 10.0
| North-West Pacific
| deep_water
|
| PacSE
| -130.2 -20.7 -89.0 -44.9
| South-East Pacific
| deep_water
|
| AtlN
| -62.5 27.0 -44.2 17.0
| North Atlantic
| deep_water
|
| AtlS
| -32.3 -9.9 -11.0 -19.9
| South Atlantic
| deep_water
|
| IndS
| 89.5 -21.2 100.1 -29.9
| South India
| deep_water
|
| AtlN55
| -50.0 60.0 -20.0 50.0
| Atlantic +50:+60
| deep_water
|
| AtlS55
| -20.0 -50.0 10.0 -60.0
| Atlantic -60:-50
| deep_water
|
| PacN45
| -170.0 50.0 -150.0 40.0
| Pacific +40:+50
| deep_water
|
| PacN35
| -170.0 40.0 -150.0 30.0
| Pacific +30:+40
| deep_water
|
| PacN25
| -170.0 30.0 -150.0 20.0
| Pacific +20:+30
| deep_water
|
| PacN15
| -170.0 20.0 -150.0 10.0
| Pacific +10:+20
| deep_water
|
| PacN05
| -170.0 10.0 -150.0 0.0
| Pacific 0:+10
| deep_water
|
| PacS05
| -170.0 0 -150.0 -10.0
| Pacific -10:0
| deep_water
|
| PacS15
| -170.0 -10.0 -150.0 -20.0
| Pacific -20:-10
| deep_water
|
| PacS25
| -170.0 -20.0 -150.0 -30.0
| Pacific -30:-20
| deep_water
|
| PacS35
| -170.0 -30.0 -150.0 -40.0
| Pacific -40:-30
| deep_water
|
| PacS45
| -170.0 -40.0 -150.0 -50.0
| Pacific -50:-40
| deep_water
|
| Sarg
| -80.0 33.0 -70.0 23.0
| Sargasso Sea
| deep_water
|
| Wmpl
| 150.0 27.5 160.0 17.5
| Wmpl
| deep_water
|
| EAust
| 155.0 -23.0 165.0 -33.0
| East Australia
| deep_water
|
| WAust
| 112.0 -10.0 122.0 -20.0
| West Australia
| deep_water
|
| Med
| -6 46.5 36 30
| Mediterranean sea
| deep_water
|
| CMed
| 14.0 41.0 24.0 31.0
| Central Mediterranean sea
| deep_water
|
| EAtl
| -16.0 40.0 -6.0 30.0
| East Atlantic
| deep_water
|
| PacEqu
| -170.0 10.0 -150.0 -10.0
| Equator Pacific
| deep_water
|
Geolocation: order is minimum longitude, maximum latitude,
maximum longitude, minimum latitude.
Deep water mask: where water depth is greater than 1000m.
Shallow water mask: where water depth is between 30m and 1000m.
Eutrophic water: where CHL1 concentration is greater than 1.0
mg/m3 + deep water condition satisfied.
Mesotrophic water: where CHL1 concentration is between 0.1 and
1.0 mg/m3 + deep water condition satisfied.
Oligotrophic water: where CHL1 concentration is lower than
0.1 mg/m3 + deep water condition satisfied.
Quality control items
Visual inspection
All MERIS level 3 products are downloaded (netCDF+XML files)
and converted in TIF format. The TIF files are opened
with the openev
software.
 
PNG files are also generated, which can be opened
with
Google
Earth. The original MERIS level 3 products at 1/12°
have been resampled on a 0.25° Plate-Carré grid
using a flux-conserving algorithm and plotted using a
parameter-specific colour scale. All products available for
any month have been packaged in a single kmz file accessible
from a dedicated web page.
Time series
Time series of monthly mean values are plotted for MERIS
sensor alone and for the three sensors. Mean values are
computed inside the various zones for the common valid bins
of the three sensors (even for MERIS alone analysis).
Following the recommendations of the IOCCG group (see
Chapter 8 of the
IOCCG report 4, 2004), a
weighted arithmetic mean formulation is used for all the
parameters, taking also into account the fact that the bins
are
defined in a Plate-Carré grid (i.e. including a
weighting factor equal to cos(Φ) where Φ is the
average bin latitude.
with
An exemple of time serie plot is shown below, where we can
see the temporal evolution of the monthly mean value of the
normalised water leaving radiance at 490 nm provided by the
three sensors inside the PacN45 zone.
Histograms
Chlorophyll histograms are build from the three sensors
monthly averaged data. They display the distribution
frequency of the chlorophyll data set in each region. The
histogram classes are defined in logarithmic scale and the
actual size of each bin of the Plate-Carré grid is
taken into account (histogram classes are increased by
cos(Φ) instead of 1). Histogram frequencies are computed
using only the common valid bins of the three sensors.
Some statistical information (mean value, coefficient of
variation) is provided in MERIS-only histogram plots. Note
that the mean value is computed here as the weighted geometrical
mean (i.e. average of the logarithmic value of the
chlorophyll concentration.
The standard deviation measures the dispersion of the
parameters around the geometrical mean. As for the mean
value, we use the weighted standard deviation
definition based on log(CHL):
with
The coefficient of variation is another measure of the
dispersion of a data set. It is defined as the ratio of the
standard deviation to the mean. It is often
expressed in %. Note that the coefficient of variation is
meaningless when the mean value is close to 0.
The histograms are normalised on each plot (i.e. all
histogram frequencies are divided by the highest one). The
normalisation is applied simultaneously to the three
histograms on the MERIS/MODIS/SeaWiFS histogram plot
(i.e. all histogram frequencies are divided by the highest
one of the three sensors).
Histogram difference plots display the absolute difference
between the histograms of MERIS or MODIS sensor and SeaWiFS.
Scatter plots
2D scatter plots are used to compare two variables representing
the same set of data: CHL1 concentrations measured by
various sensors. By construction, only the common valid bins
are used to build the plot.
The following scatter plots are available:
- MERIS CHL1 versus MODIS CHL1,
- MERIS CHL1 versus SeaWiFS CHL1,
- MODIS CHL1 versus SeaWiFS CHL1,
A density colour scale is applied to the plot points to
highlight the regions of high frequencies.
Statistical information is provided on each plot.
- Slope of the linear regression line,
- Intercept of the linear regression line,
- Correlation coefficient,
- Root Mean Square Deviation,
- Bias.
To perform a linear regression on a scatter plot of two
measurement data sets, we have selected the reduced major
axis regression (RMA) rather than the ordinary least square
method (OLS) as both data sets involved are measurements
affected by errors. The RMA method minimises the sum of the
horizontal and vertical distances between the data set
points and the regression line. Note that the regression is
performed in a logarithmic scale
for chlorophyll.
The slope b of the linear regression line is given by:
with
The intercept a is:
The correlation coefficient is:
The root mean square deviation (or RMSD) and bias give a
statistical measure of the magnitude of the absolute
difference between two data sets coming from different
origins (sensors, processors...). Note that the RMSD and
bias quantities are computed in logarithmic scale for the
chlorophyll concentration and in linear scale for all other
parameters.
Linear scale:
Logarithmic scale:
Anomalies
MERIS chlorophyll (CHL1) monthly anomaly maps are
available. They are based on the 6 years of available MERIS
data. In a first step, climatological monthly products are
computed from the MERIS monthly level 3 products. Then,
the anomaly maps are produced by subtracting the
climatological monthly averages from the monthly
products.
The difference is expressed in a dual-log color scale
between -10 and +10 milligrams per cubic meter.
The grey color represents land areas. The black color
represents areas where no data is available (e.g. latitude
limitation due to observation condition, cloud
cover, etc). Blue/purple colors indicate that the monthly average
is lower than the climatology while yellow/red colors indicate
a higher value. White color is used when the difference is
not significant (1.e-3 mg/m3).